A Different Version of History

Direct link to the YouTube (below):

https://www.youtube.com/@Adifferentversionofhistory/videos

Presenting some information that is different than what we are normally conditioned to believe. A re-assessment of historical events based on source documents. ____________________________

I keep seeing the true statement on FB - "Whatever comes next, do not comply". The covid garbage is all a hoax so every single thing they say surrounding it is 100% false. There is no virus, no symptoms, no tests, no treatment, no immunity, nothing at all. It is a strong delusion that has come over people. Ignore it completely. Whatever is coming will be due to all the so called vaccines that at least half of our nation took. I am hearing more and more odd illnesses (vaccine related) even now, a couple of years after they were taken. One very healthy friend of ours who believed the delusion and would not listen to reason or logic took the vaccine and was fine until now. Now has bells palsy and a myriad of other issues that the "doctors" call "shingles". "Shingles" is just a word used to hide vaccine injuries/poisoning.

____________________________

Some great WW2 related quotes I recently came across:

"I participated in the attempts to remove Hitler in complete awareness of the responsibility I incurred in doing so. To be sure, now that I know who masterminded this revolt and who would probably have benefitted from it, I can see that it would have come to a bad end, had the attempt succeeded, and I realize that I have served the wrong cause."

-Captain Freidrich Klausing, traitor who was involved in the assassination attempt on AH, at his trial before execution.

"Does anyone believe that the two major Churches prayed for Hitler and his government for twelve whole years - and not only within Germany! - because deep down they really believed that he and his government were diabolical? I think this theory may safely be dismissed as out of the question.

From 1932 on I was personally acquainted with the papal nuncio Orsenigo, who for many years was a most respected ambassador of the Holy See to Berlin. Whenever he spoke about Hitler it was always in an appreciative, sometimes even an admiring vein. I never once knew him to voice anything negative. I was also well acquainted with Ambassadors Alfieri (Italy) and Frölicher (Switzerland), the Irish Ambassador, who remained supportive to the very end, as well as the Ambassadors of Japan (Oshima), Spain, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria.

It goes without saying that all these gentlemen listened to foreign radio broadcasts as well as to the German ones, in order to compare them. That was their privilege. In this way they regularly learned what new accusations the slanderers aimed at Germany. It was their right to demand pertinent information from the governments they were accredited to, and so they were always well-informed. They were also free to send informed members of their staff back to their countries of origin, for purposes of reporting there.

Not one of the many foreign diplomats whom I met in Berlin in the course of more than ten years considered Hitler's regime to be "criminal". They voiced criticism wherever they felt that something needed to be remedied - and it was their right as well as their duty to do so. But all of them without exception admired the German national community as Hitler's greatest achievement. All of them acknowledged that Hitler preserved not only Germany but all of Europe from Communism. And many of them admired Hitler as a very brilliant man whose existence was a blessing, and not only for Germany.

I particularly remember the English diplomat Sir Ivon Kirkpatrick. We were personal friends of his and his family's. Once he even attended a meeting of the NSDAP which was being held in the Reddest part of Berlin, and at which I was the sole speaker. When he congratulated me afterwards, he remarked that it was a great pity that only very few of the foreigners who came to Germany so full of curiosity had the chance to witness such a meeting. It was only at this meeting, he said, that he had fully realized that what was happening in Germany was a primarily Socialist revolution which - adapted, of course, to reflect individual situations - could be of immense benefit to all nations!"

-Friedrich Christian Prince of Schaumburg-Lippe

"As early as January 2, 1938, Herr v. Ribbentrop had reported to Hitler from London:

"If England and her allies are stronger than Germany and her friends, then in my opinion she will definitely strike sooner or later. RibbentropIf, on the other hand, Germany can manage to shape her policy vis-à-vis her allies in such a way that a German power configuration is stronger than or perhaps equal to the British, it might be possible that Britain would prefer a peaceful settlement.... Regardless of any tactics or diplomatic interludes which might be attempted with us, each and every day in the future that is not guided first and foremost by a view of England as our most dangerous opponent would be a gain for our enemies. I have striven for friendship with Britain for years now, and nothing would make me happier than to see it come about. When I requested the Führer to send me to London I was doubtful whether it might work, but in light of Edward VIII, a last attempt seemed warranted. Today I no longer believe in the possibility of conciliation. Britain does not want a powerful Germany that would represent a constant threat to the British island. Britain will fight for her hegemonic position!""

"Lieutenant Colonel Willis N. Everett, Jr., an American lawyer who had served as defense counsel for the seventy-four Germans accused in the Malmedy case, petitioned the United States Supreme Court, after his return to America, charging that the Germans had NOT had a fair trial.

The Supreme Court refused his petition, saying it lacked jurisdiction over the acts committed by the United States Army in Germany, a statement which means that the United States Military Government is above the law, and the “sovereignty” we claim in Germany is that of a lawless despot."

-"The High Cost of Vengeance" by Freda Utley, 1949

Robert Boothby, the British Representative in Strassbourg, in Europe and Decision:

"That is why we were amazed indeed when Chamberlain informed us on March 31 of our unconditional and one-sided promissory guarantee to Poland. I was then of the opinion, and continue to feel to this day, that in the absence of a binding alliance with Russia this was an act of sheer madness, for in doing so we had made a far-reaching promise which, it was clear beforehand, we could not keep. Lloyd George immediately asked whether the General Staff had consented to our committing ourselves to the defense of a nation entirely inaccessible to us. He received no reply.

"Poland succumbed to the Blitzkrieg in only three weeks. We did not lift a finger or start an airplane in her assistance. How should we have? There was not even a tangible sense of the urgency of the matter."

A short exert from Dr. Günter Polzin who served in the 2nd Company of schwere Panzer Abteilung 503:

"On September 9th, our Tiger, fully fit for action, had taken up a position on the Merefa-Heights, near Kharkov. Our new Funker was Panzerschütze Nabel. We were actually all alone in the area; we changed position often, appeared again and again somewhere else in order to keep and create the ruse that several Panzers were on guard duty. During the night, alertness was somewhat reduced. Fahrer and Funker folded back their seats and slept relatively well in a semi-reclined position. As the Ladeschütze, I had the best place and could fully stretch out. The Kommandant and the Richtschütze often sat, sometimes for days, on their small leather seats, and the Richtschütze, with his forehead on the rubber eyecup of his optics, could only doze off from time to time. At dawn on September 10th, still on height 160.3, Russian infantry tried to overrun us. They came without preparation and with no support from heavy weapons, in wave after wave, one man beside the other with arms linked. One had the impression that they were under the influence of alcohol and were being threatened from behind when they did not advance. The Kommander issued the orders and the Richtschütze opened up with the turret machine gun while the Funker fired with his hull machine gun. Belt after belt was pumped into the advancing Russian hordes and they kept coming over the bodies of their comrades until they were completely broken. The scene in front of us was nightmarish; it was hard to imagine what motivated people to sacrifice themselves in such a manner. We had fired almost all of our MG ammunition to stop that attack. It is quite difficult to describe the nightmare of that scene – we had heard the stories of the human wave assaults, but this was our first real taste of a truly suicidal, unsupported infantry attack against armor. We were all more than a little disturbed and killing like that takes its toll on the psyche – even if we were defending ourselves."

"The official ie. publicly accessible wording of the Anglo-Polish Mutual Assistance Pact of August 25 speaks of protection from any European power. When Germany had overcome Poland and Russia visited war on the other half, Ambassador Harvey, speaking in the House of Commons on October 19, 1939, innocently asked whether this treaty did not also pertain to attacks by non-European powers, in other words, Russia. He was given the official reply, in writing, that Poland and England had expressly agreed in the course of their negotiations that this treaty applied only to a possible attack by Germany."

"As for the time prior to Munich, it ought to suffice to recount the comment which Frau von Ribbentrop relayed to her husband's defense counsel in Nuremberg. In 1937 Churchill had said to Ribbentrop in the Embassy at London: "If Germany regains her power, she will be crushed again." When Ribbentrop objected that it would not be as easy this time as it had been in 1914, since Germany had friends on her side, Churchill rejoined: "Oh, we are quite good at persuading those friends to join us in the end." The British prosecutor declined retrieval and presentation of the report which v. Ribbentrop had sent to Hitler about this, saying: "What my friend Churchill said in the course of that conversation is irrelevant.""

_______________________________________________

A couple of our new shirts.