The "scientific" community has known for quite some time about the Khazarian connection. I've included data on this topic on this website. Nothing was leaked as the title of the article below claims. I read at least one abstract on this matter myself. Several years ago, in fact. So, what is the angle?
Do I believe that "They" are Khazarians? I don't believe anything at all, of course. Belief requires faith and tends to be merely a decision that people make not at all contingent on reality lots of times. Instead, I look at patterns, proclivities, and tendencies.
The Khazarian "story" is just something set up for exploitation if the tides permit. Off the cuff, it's an attempt to plant an idea and test the waters at the same time. We've witnessed this model over and over at varying levels and extents. This is about making a bid for the legitimacy to steal somebody else's land. End of story. I think this piece is interesting not because of any assumed or presumed acknowledgment(s) but because it's the first attempt that I've seen to grab the Khazarian story by the horns and make it useful. Remember, you can't have anything. They will find a way to make it work for them.
Comments